The problem sounds like a good thing. It’s not.

Responding to reports from peer reviewers is a crucial part of scientific publishing, but early-career researchers are rarely taught about this process.

The work of a scholarly press’s editorial board may fly under the radar, but it’s critical in upholding quality and ...

The vast amount of misinformation circulating in public health is largely due to not understanding evidence-based science.

I took a shot and I wrote an article to a scientific journal, and next thing you know, it went through the peer review ...

A top management journal measured AI’s impact on submissions and reviews. Submissions rose 42%, writing quality declined and ...

Rafael Ribas, a professor of economics, has extended his impact from Boise State to the global stage by serving as a reviewer ...

The following types of contribution to Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis, Resources, Reviews, ...

The European Research Council (ERC) — an important funder that is investing €16 billion (US$18.7 billion) in research between ...

Peer review isn’t just about swapping papers—it’s a powerful tool to sharpen your writing and critical thinking. When done well, it builds confidence, fosters collaboration, and leads to stronger ...

AI 'scientists' as the future of science, how music can affect plant growth, scientists expose fish to cocaine, a short ...

Ivy Tech vice president emeritus Ben Young was honored by the Higher Learning Commission for his service as a peer reviewer.